oldschool CxC

Friday, September 07, 2007



Hey, did Keith Olbermann just say 'impeach Bush'? Hmmmm...
I guess there's at least one media person out there that's sorta covering some parts of the truth.

Although I'm concerned that he doesn't ever touch the 9/11 cover up.

Once you realize there was a cover up by both parties after a (semi)failed coup attempt by the right-wing 'pro-war' secret military/spy organizations of Washington with 9/11 (I just learned that 9/11 was 10 yrs after G.Bush Sr's "New World Order" message), these 'revelations' that G.Bush Jr is lying about leaving Iraq anytime soon are not quite as revelatory. I say semi-failed coup b/c the Anthrax letters seem to have succeeded in pressuring a bunch of govt people to not go after impeaching Bush.

I work on a leftwing TV show where the writer constantly asks, "Why isn't the idea that Osama Bin Laden organizing a group of hijackers from a cave in Afghanistan called a conspiracy theory? Why is it only a conspiracy theory if people say American groups were involved?"

Also, according to Occam's Razor ...
Isn't it be more likely that the same right-wing fascists in the US govt that pushed the USA into the Iraq War (#2) also coordinated 9/11? These are the same groups that profit from war and conquering foreign lands (and oil -- Operation Iraqi Liberation was the name of the attack, after all), who control the military, the media, and most of the wealth of the USA ... vs some radical extremist in Afghanistan attacking the USA?

Seems like 'the razor' cuts both ways.

Just saw another Olbermann video, this is where he says G.Bush Jr is 'the worst person on Earth', and he asks Bush & Cheney to resign now, and says "Bush has given up all rights to be President of anything other than his priviledged little cabal of weath." HA HA

Labels: , , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Erik said...

You seem to go back and forth, so let me ask you directly: Are you part of the LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) 9/11 conspiracy theory or MIHOP (made it happen on purpose)?

Seems to me you were squarely MIHOP, then posts in the last year made me think you'd graduated to LIHOP... I could be wrong. Just curious where you stand today.

9:12 AM  
Blogger Erik said...

Also, I think most people would not consider the -- let's call it the "accepted narrative" -- for the 9/11 attacks a conspiracy theory because Bin Laden and his cohorts admitted to it, continue to refer to it as an overwhelming success and use it in their recruiting. Certainly by definition it's a conspiracy, but popular usage of the term would indicate a denial (like the JFK assassination).

And not that it matters, but Bin Laden was not operating from a "cave" on 9/11, he was well-funded (just on his own he inherited $80 Millon as a 13-year-old), a protected patron of the Taliban government in Afghanistan, and the leader of an Islamic resistance group. So: money + state sponsor + religiously-inspired followers. Hmm, you're right, how could he have possibly pulled 9/11 off?

9:27 AM  
Blogger REkz said...

Not sure if either acronym fits, but ...

I think Bush Sr/Jr said something like, 'hey, Bin Laden, we gave you 2billion a few years back and you've still got some left. Can you do us a favor and stage an attack against the USA?'

Osama bin Laden said, "Sure brother Bush! And please say hi to my family next time you all hang out."

Then they worked out a plan where Marvin Bush would bomb the WTC (and building 7) after the planes struck, as well as shoot at the Pentagon.

That's why, when it happened, Bush' only job was to sit there and make sure a) no response, b) don't break a sweat, and c) become King of the USA.

And it worked -- regardless of whether he had the book upside down, he still is closer to emperor of the Christian (aka Catholic aka Roman)empire more than any leader has been since Hitler.

At least, that's my view.

LIHOP or MIHOP isn't the difference.

Have HOPE or not, that's the difference.

I'm for IMPEACHING THE EMPIRE

11:48 PM  
Blogger Sony said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

1:21 PM  
Blogger Sony said...

If the motive for getting Bin laden and Marvin Bush to stage the attacks was for Bush to become King, what happens to that theory when he quietly resigns office and hands over power to Hillary in January 2009?

You'll probably have to develop a new line of thought on motive.

1:23 PM  
Blogger REkz said...

9/11 was, as the Republicans described it, America's "Pearl Harbor" which we needed to be able to dive back into wars.

They are fighting with all their strength the "Vietnam syndrome" which resulted in USA 'losing' a war b/c the people did not want it -- and the people won.

Just imagine -- if not for the social movements against Vietnam War, we'd still have the draft today.

Keeping USA at war helps the wealthy stay on top. It's redistribution of tax money thru the war machine and back out in profits.

If he steps down, it's King for 8 years. But 9/11 and Anthrax bombs and all that stuff were about claiming power. Tyrannical power concealed behind smoke & mirrors.

1:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home